Debat2el Constelación colectiva. Documentos fuente que configuran la constelación colectiva

  1. Úrsula Bischofberger Valdes says:

    Hola, companys.
    Primer un comentari personal i després un institucional.

    Us vull comentar que he treballat molt a gust amb vosaltres. Ha estat una experiència bonica la del grup CrearCaos que hem constituït, sobretot per les sorpreses. Dos-cents missatges, cap, hores intempestives, meetings amb moto, vídeos imprevisibles, escoltar el company parlant anglès i anglesos “de veritat”. Un plaer conviure amb tu, Guillem, no només per la teva facilitat de paraula escrita sinó també per la sincera empatia que mostres i com dissols els frecs que, amb tu, es queden gens.

    Dentre totes les sorpreses que m’he portat, la millor, sens dubte, és la seguretat visual, el bon estil i format, el sentit estètic de Marina muntant el vídeo final. Ai, em quedo amb les ganes de muntar altres rellotges encarnats de temps i el procediment de creació d’arxius font performatius i muntatge posterior amb un fil argumental trencat m’ha semblat molt fructífer. Us poso això en català i la crítica institucional en anglès…

    The introductory collective performance work by Marina Ordóñez Brumos, Guillem Alfonso-Kuban Alocen, and myself could be characterized in different ways, but I will develop this critique by focusing on three adjectives.

    Friendly. Starting from the idea that BDSM attitudes are appropriate for a fictional setting, but not for performance art, where the action is real, I could say that I’m very glad I didn’t cut my stomach with a razor or injure myself with whiplash, etc. It was a work that developed on its own: Marina liked it from a distance, Guillem immediately made conceptual contributions, and I loved reflecting on it during those weeks when I neglected my other subjects.

    Clean. It was a project that facilitated the difficult virtual coordination of people who had the merit of combining work and studies in a project whose simplicity did not prevent a sufficiently complex yet intelligible final result. It’s worth noting that this was the first time they worked together. You could say they were dancing to the same beat, which is commendable.

    Without scientific advice (it couldn’t have been ACTS), but at the same time serene. I say serene because solitude always seems pejorative, but it’s a project for which, as I said, I wrote to some scientists asking for advice during the initial stages (who didn’t respond). We tried to reach conceptual agreements, but there was no way to agree on definitions. Consequently, it was a veritable constellation of three stars, each rotating in its own space, but all three in harmony… and the sun of science didn’t shine on us. Once again.
    In conclusion: a project that, as we’ve repeatedly said, developed quite unpredictably, but, like Shakespeare’s play, there was a method to the madness. Isn’t that art?

  2. Úrsula Bischofberger Valdes says:

    He pensat que si voleu diem al professor que la següent performance la fem col·lectiva també. Voleu?